Chronology of the Lawsuit at Mohu Mohu Café

1. On February 11, 2024, the plaintiff visited Mohu Mohu Cafe to use their services. The establishment informed the plaintiff of their service terms, including the possibility of being bitten or scratched by cats. After explaining the terms, the plaintiff proceeded to use the services.
2. On the same day, while playing with a 4-month-old cat named Rena in the third-floor cat room, Rena climbed onto the plaintiff’s skirt and accidentally bit the plaintiff’s skirt during play. Later, when the plaintiff used the skirt again to play with Rena, the cat mistakenly bit the plaintiff’s leg through the skirt.
3. After being bitten by Rena, the plaintiff went downstairs to report the injury to the staff. The staff immediately provided first aid by cleaning the wound, applying antiseptic, and placing a plaster. Additionally, the staff assured the plaintiff that all cats at the café had received rabies vaccinations and other necessary shots.
4. After receiving first aid from the staff, the plaintiff borrowed an apron from the café and returned to the third-floor cat room to play for approximately 50 minutes.
5. Following the completion of the services, the plaintiff descended to the first floor to make payment to the owner. After paying, the owner asked the plaintiff if she had been bitten by a cat. The plaintiff explained she had been bitten because the cat mistook the skirt for a toy. Subsequently, the plaintiff paid for the service and left the café.
6. Around 5:00 PM on the same day, the plaintiff called the café to inquire about the vaccination status of the cats and whether there was documentation of their vaccinations. The owner confirmed that all cats were vaccinated and provided the necessary certificates.
7. Later, on Monday, February 12, 2024, at 7:16 PM, the plaintiff sent a message to the café via Instagram requesting a response within one day. However, the owner did not respond within the requested time, citing not having Instagram notifications set up and it being the café’s scheduled day off the next day. As a result, the plaintiff criticized the owner for neglecting to respond and take responsibility for the incident.
8. On Sunday, February 18, 2024, police officers called the café four times after the plaintiff expressed interest in pursuing legal action against the owner for not responding to messages on Instagram and Facebook. The plaintiff also attempted to call the café but was refused by the owner.
9. The police instructed the plaintiff to visit the police station on February 18, 2024. However, due to the café being busy with customers that day, the owner was unable to leave to meet the police. After concluding the phone call with the police, the owner accessed Instagram messages and promptly responded to the plaintiff’s message. The plaintiff later stated, “No need to apologize. It’s too late.”
10. On May 11, 2024, the plaintiff received a court notice regarding the incident.